Theres two components to what we are proposing.
One is the Direct Democracy system itself and the other is the one policy anti political political party.
The Direct Democracy system itself requires developers, technology consultation, administrators, a committee to oversee the referendums and the marketing and direction of the operation.
The political party side of things is mainly all about marketing and administration.
Funding comes from the people in the form of donations and memberships and not from any companies or authorities.
Just read the article on funding, interesting points for sure! But isnt it strange how we never discuss funding for mental health? Its like weve become numb to this issue. I argue that we need to prioritize this; its a real problem affecting real people, no? Thoughts?
Interesting read, but its missing the mark on one critical area – arts and culture. Why are we not prioritizing funding for this? Its essential for our societys enrichment and creativity. Lets not forget, its not all about infrastructure and tech advancements. A society thrives with a vibrant arts scene too!
Interesting read! However, Im left wondering, why isnt there more focus on funding for mental health initiatives? In these stressful times, shouldnt that be a priority? Just a thought. Were all battling unseen battles, after all.